
Is DOGE improving efficiency and reducing waste in the government? No. And before I discuss why not, let’s understand the definition of efficiency in concept and in practice.
First, efficiency is measured like an equation – it requires a stated and expected outcome – the constant. And the variables are the resources and processes applied to obtain that outcome. Here’s an example; an automobile needs to get you to a destination. That automobile requires resources, including initial cost, fuel, maintenance, repairs – the combined costs of reaching your stated outcome. But, the objective remains static – you still need to get to work. Consider Miles-Per-Gallon. in order to measure MPG efficiency, the “Miles” part needs to stay constant and the variable becomes the gallons needed to obtain the mileage outcome. You can reverse these, but clearly the objective is never to just put a gallon in your tank and then see how far you get. If you want to increase efficiency, you attempt to reduce the resources needed to obtain the objective. That is NOT what is happening at DOGE – they are changing (or removing) the desired outcome, dismantling the equation, and claiming that the resulting reduction of cost is increased efficiency. Whether you support what they are doing or not, the“E” in DOGE is a mischaracterization that the American public is being asked to believe. Don’t fall for it.
Continue reading “Understanding Efficiency (an Op-Ed)”